‘Innovation through Convolution’, ‘Connotations and Decision making practices’

Created at 2021/06/19 by Nischal

‘Connotations’ as suggested by Oxford dictionary is an idea suggested by a word in addition to its main meaning (Oxford dictionary). Evolved in mid-16^th century, the word is rooted into Medieval Latin society, which means to mark the addition of something and to note the effect combining together or simply creating block-chains; the shuttle form of mixing the idea together and interpolating it to bring new dimension of the reality over pre-existing matters. It has been a practice ever so and the sources of new idea have always been pre-dated forces or the hypothesis test based on the fact of known proximity of the substantive character that can come into momentum and ignite a flame of choices. The result of which is a judgment of some kind; decision making.

Whilst being evolved from the theory of the states of an object put onto observation and measurement of external forces against of it; it identifies the changing nature of the subject put on rest and how first motion of momentum is created by the first strike of the external matters penetrating in the subject kept in a close observation. While we are just trying to measure the change of it over original state of, the art of convolution has been a running practice forever, where we measured the mass of the body, pressure and forces striking upon the subject of observations that help the subject move or decide to move. It helps the observant to connote the new meaning existence from the perceived notions of subject. These existences only come into effects only after inter-polar effect i.e. we keep our subject as the two objects colliding in. These two objects possess triggering ignition and with univalent characteristics. A univalent character becomes the value center for every decision making. While the know-hows of the repelling forces and its reaction i.e. the degree of proximity it will travel becomes a measuring aider within subtle chances of probable collision with other triggering forces having ignition capacity i.e. higher magnitude of mass the bigger the collision and bigger the disruptions.

The newton third law of motions highly focused on these testing blocks of points stating what objects can be objectified and what can be kept into consideration i.e. interaction of forces and frictions to derive the reciprocal events seen in the object kept in magnifying glasses to measure the effects within a pressure zone and other counterparts associated with it. With varied nature of object and subjects, we forget to consider the terms objects can be of serving nature as well, intangible and consumed simultaneously within the pressuring act. And no wonder why thoughts are highly of non-product natured and inseparable. Having these magnitude traits it remains into existence and are easily visible with every action catered. Can this perishability and wearing out nature of thoughts be objectified and taken as a subject for quality mapping?  Can the research of physics conducted between 1666 -1686 by newton himself, serve as a base to how human phycology? Can this theory reacts to the deemed theory of decision making?

The ideal state of ramification is the start of convolution. Deemed within the value of the object, it is of enigmatic nature ready to ignite within flammable aptitudes of external forces. Origin in the mid-16^th century and derived from the word convolvere or to ‘roll together’, the decision making process has always been a subject of test dependent over the events and outcomes combined together. What better art of connotation can exist other than this shuttle form implied in every decision making process. In midst of the large number of complicated and unexpected results, in an awry or calmness each and every human became boundless to precede actions or bounded to follow an actions. So, shuttle form of decision making starts from the inbuilt nature and alternatives that we chose is either an anecdote. The interaction of the outer or external force may not be primarily but despite of knowing the fact of primarily quenches, the externalities are always chosen as testing variables guided by natural instincts. But can we map what guides the natural instinct for decision making? How data of past or assumption of future can cripple the current state of minds in taking actions? How can this indistinct sense pass the hypothetical test?

In building blocks for terming uncertainties, the probability of turning out of events as it unfolds, will have two probable events and as we have put these things into a test, it can either change the nature of reality or our hypothesis can go wrong. And in between these outputs, all other result is an art of connotation. To address how entire subjects put into test exaggerate two multiply by two equals five effect is only through knowing this art of connoting and scholars studying and practicing human psychology  must addressed this first. It is because as progressive innovation is just an art of connotation but the human psychology is radical. What ignites the first thought to ensemble to a certain quest of human mind or what drive rides a human mind to take an action can theorize every matters of human command.